Pages

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Tabitha and Nellie

For Sunday, April 25th, 2010

(Graphic is the Apostle Peter raising Tabitha from the dead.  From a mid 12th century mosaic in the Palatine Chapel in Palermo, Italy)

Lectionary Reading - Acts 9:36-43 (NRSV)

Now in Joppa there was a disciple whose name was Tabitha, which in Greek is Dorcas. She was devoted to good works and acts of charity. At that time she became ill and died. When they had washed her, they laid her in a room upstairs. Since Lydda was near Joppa, the disciples, who heard that Peter was there, sent two men to him with the request, "Please come to us without delay."

So Peter got up and went with them; and when he arrived, they took him to the room upstairs. All the widows stood beside him, weeping and showing tunics and other clothing that Dorcas had made while she was with them.

Peter put all of them outside, and then he knelt down and prayed. He turned to the body and said, "Tabitha, get up." Then she opened her eyes, and seeing Peter, she sat up. He gave her his hand and helped her up. Then calling the saints and widows, he showed her to be alive.

This became known throughout Joppa, and many believed in the Lord. Meanwhile he stayed in Joppa for some time with a certain Simon, a tanner.

Tabitha and Nellie

Though I would hardly consider her a regular churchgoer, Nellie Peters was a person of deep and abiding faith who routinely provided healing ministry as a psychiatric nurse. I know since I had the privilege of working side by side with her for nearly five years in an adult day treatment program.

In several ways, Nellie’s life had parallels to Tabitha who is considered the patron saint of seamstresses and tailors. The parallel is that these women served the poor and poor in spirit and while Tabitha knit and tailored garments to help such persons, Nellie wove damaged psyches back together. And if another parallel could be drawn, it would be that irrepressible spirits inhabited both ladies. Death couldn’t stop Tabitha, at least the first time around. As for Nellie, those who tried to oppress life and lives would have to deal with her. For me, Nellie’s courage in that way was an example for me as she always did right by others rather than doing what was convenient or what seemed the path of least resistance. Nellie would let you know what she was thinking and was perfectly comfortable doing so. As one psychologist put it, “Nearly everyone would say that Nellie is the most actualized person they’ve ever known.”

What that meant is that Nellie was formidable, but in the most positive sense. She loved people more than life itself. She was brilliant and incredibly skilled as a clinician. She had a phenomenal sense of humor coupled with boundless energy. Any person stuck in the sickening narcissistic rut of needing to prove herself or himself found Nellie the ultimate threat and obstacle. Why? Because Nellie was entirely comfortable in her own skin; she would speak freely and frankly as to what she thought you were doing or up to and whether or not it was in the best interest of others. If you had ulterior motives that needed the light of day – even motives outside of your awareness – you can bet Nellie would let you know. So for those who had ears to hear, Nellie offered a wisdom and way of being that helped people come home to themselves in order to be the best kind of individual possible for blessing the lives of others. In short, Nellie was a force to be reckoned with and the sooner you realized it, the better your life was for it. Truly the grace of Christ resided with her though attending Catholic Mass was a limited to a few times a year.

Perhaps the day that those insights came home most to me most was during a session with the parents of one of our day treatment attendees. This particular person, Rick (not his real name), had made little progress in our program. He had come to us for follow-up services after a recent hospitalization. He suffered with severe anxiety and compulsive hand-washing which prevented this bright and likeable young adult from pursuing his college studies. As was often the case in situations when someone wasn’t improving in treatment, we asked family members to visit with us regarding the home and family situation since in Rick’s case he was living at home with his parents. In our session with Rick’s parents, it didn’t take long to see what contributed to Rick’s anxiety. His father was arrogant, disrespectful, and spoke poorly of his son. For her part, Rick’s mother sat in silence and rarely looked at anyone or said anything. Soon in our conversation, it became that the father ruled his wife’s and son’s lives through belligerence and intimidation and given his immense size, I sensed that disobeying him could be frightening.

But the question had to be stated and when the timing seemed best, I said, “Has your son ever disobeyed you, ever gone against your wishes?” The man became enraged and viciousness took over his expression as he belittled me. I nearly thought he would come out of his chair at me given the evil that came over him. Caught completely off guard by the man’s intensity, I responded by saying, “I’m simply asking a question.” But the man continued to rage at how I dared to ask such things and that his son would never think of going against him.

Fogged and nearly immobilized from my lack of anticipating the man’s anger, Nellie stepped in. Relaxed and straightforwardly she asked, “Do you think your son is afraid of you?” In that moment, the man nearly stopped dead in his tracks, “What did you say?” Nellie replied, “I asked if you think your son is afraid of you.”

Coming out of my fog, it appeared as though the possibility had never crossed the man’s mind. With his gaze now on Nellie, she then said, “I ask this because I think that your son is quite frightened of you. And if a man is frightened of the persons who are suppose to be the closest to him, then he’s going to be frightened of nearly everything else in life and he will not be able to cope.”

Something at that point seemed to soften in the man and eventually we were able to move the session toward a positive and productive end with hopes for improving the home environment. I don’t remember that Rick ever completed treatment successfully. The anxiety and obsessive compulsive behaviors had already etched themselves so deeply into the man’s psyche and physiology that available treatments at the time may not have been very helpful. Hopefully, as time has gone along, Rick has been able to benefit from the treatment advances that have occurred since then.

But what made Nellie my Tabitha that day was our conversation together as we debriefed the session with Rick’s parents. Being upset with myself for failing to anticipate how the father’s anger and evil could overtake me, I asked Nellie how she managed to be so composed and relaxed while I had been so overwhelmed. Simply but gently she said, “I knew that we had to get his mind thinking about something else, but you also did what needed to be done which is that you asked the question that needed stating and now we know why Rick is so troubled.” Nellie and I talked quite a while longer about the father’s bullying nature, the cowardice and feelings of inadequacy that underpinned it, and quite likely the lack of good role models in the father’s own life.

As a young clinician with limited experience at that time, it proved to be an important learning opportunity. Long and short of it, I came away from that conversation with Nellie understanding whole new dimensions related to anger and intense emotions. Those have since taught me not to fear these things but to welcome and appreciate them as part of the healing work we do in God’s name, i.e. allowing those feelings their place and time and presence whenever and wherever they weave themselves into the fabric of our lives. May you learn the same capacity for yourself but never be victim to the abuse itself is my hope and prayer this week.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

"You Will Never Know..."

For Sunday, April 18th, 2010

(Photo of stained glass window in St Mary's church in Fairford, Gloucestershire.  Portrays this week's lectionary reading.  Church was built in the 1490s.  It's unique among English parish churches for its near complete pre-Reformation glass windows.  Photo by Lawrence Lew, a Dominican friar of the English Province currently based in Blackfriars, Oxford.)

Lectionary Reading – John 21:1-19 (NRSV)

After these things Jesus showed himself again to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias; and he showed himself in this way. Gathered there together were Simon Peter, Thomas called the Twin, Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, the sons of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. Simon Peter said to them, "I am going fishing." They said to him, "We will go with you." They went out and got into the boat, but that night they caught nothing. Just after daybreak, Jesus stood on the beach; but the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. Jesus said to them, "Children, you have no fish, have you?" They answered him, "No." He said to them, "Cast the net to the right side of the boat, and you will find some." So they cast it, and now they were not able to haul it in because there were so many fish. That disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, "It is the Lord!" When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put on some clothes, for he was naked, and jumped into the sea. But the other disciples came in the boat, dragging the net full of fish, for they were not far from the land, only about a hundred yards off. When they had gone ashore, they saw a charcoal fire there, with fish on it, and bread. Jesus said to them, "Bring some of the fish that you have just caught." So Simon Peter went aboard and hauled the net ashore, full of large fish, a hundred fifty-three of them; and though there were so many, the net was not torn.

Jesus said to them, "Come and have breakfast." Now none of the disciples dared to ask him, "Who are you?" because they knew it was the Lord. Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and did the same with the fish. This was now the third time that Jesus appeared to the disciples after he was raised from the dead. When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord; you know that I love you." Jesus said to him, "Feed my lambs." A second time he said to him, "Simon son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord; you know that I love you." Jesus said to him, "Tend my sheep." He said to him the third time, "Simon son of John, do you love me?" Peter felt hurt because he said to him the third time, "Do you love me?" And he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." Jesus said to him, "Feed my sheep.

Very truly, I tell you, when you were younger, you used to fasten your own belt and to go wherever you wished. But when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will fasten a belt around you and take you where you do not wish to go." (He said this to indicate the kind of death by which he would glorify God.) After this he said to him, "Follow me."

“You Will Never Know.....”

The commentary resource used for this week’s scripture notes that the above events constitute the third time the apostles have met with the Risen Christ. On this occasion, Peter’s mind is troubled. He’s troubled over his denials of knowing Jesus prior to the crucifixion. Likely he thinks that his transgressions are beyond repentance and reconciliation especially since Jesus has somehow conquered death. Confronted with this new reality and new order of things, Perter's unsure of what to do. Overwhelmed by frustration, he decides to go back to fishing since that’s what he knows and what he did before Jesus came into his life. The real problem however is that Peter is having difficulty envisioning what his role will be in the new order of things. He’s unable to sort it through. Exasperated, he casts off his apostolic role and settles for fishing. The problem is that the future is at stake; for if Peter and the other apostles are caught up again into their old lives it’s unlikely there will be a movement to pursue the cause for God’s Peaceable Kingdom here on earth.

To keep that from happening, Jesus creates a compelling situation for Peter. He does so in just the right place at the right time. The setting is kept simple; nothing more than a breakfast of bread and fish cooked over coals after which there will follow a fireside beach chat. During that conversation, Jesus gives Peter the opportunity to affirm his love and loyalty; so for each of three denials, Peter ends up making an affirmation of love and fidelity to Christ’s cause. Painful and hard as the conversation is, Peter insists each time, "Yes Lord, you know that I love you." Jesus responds with, "Feed my sheep." The point of the conversation is that if Peter loves Christ, his love needs to be put into action so that others may know the hope and promise of the Peaceable Kingdom. Christ then offers a sign to Peter of what will herald that he’s been successful in his endeavors. The sign is nothing less than that Peter’s mortal life will end in the same way as Christ’s did. Peter is then restored to his calling when Jesus says, “Follow me.” And what those two words lift up is that it’s not by one’s own strength or wisdom or righteousness that one’s vision is created or one’s ministry is compelled. It is the Spirit of Christ which provides these.

In light of the lectionary scripture and foregoing commentary, my faith tradition asks two questions this week. It asks if you and I have had dark moments in our lives when suddenly we saw Jesus “standing on the shore” and if so, what caused us to recognize him?

What comes to mind for me was a situation some years ago as a young adult while working in a bank as an officer trainee. Largely on a whim, I had moved from Minneapolis, Minnesota to the Kansas City, Missouri area. In Minneapolis, I had been a full time undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota majoring in psychology. To support myself and defray college expenses, I also worked part-time as a bank teller. At Minnesota, I anticipated a long endeavor in graduate studies toward a doctorate in clinical psychology, but after a year into my studies something else happened. And that “something else” was my sense of God urging me to relocate to Kansas City where my church’s international headquarters resided.

Before long the relocation to Kansas City was accomplished and I obtained work at an area bank. I contemplated continuing in banking rather than returning to university to complete my psychology studies. I had been working in the banking industry for three years. It felt like stable work with a secure future. I was a management officer trainee. The pay was reasonable and would certainly improve in short order. The bank president and vice-presidents were encouraging and eager about my development. Yet, something seemed wrong and soon it became obvious. What was obvious is that non-management workers were treated disrespectfully. After an event or two of seeing such individuals reduced to tears for doing work the way they should, I asked myself, “How can I allow myself to be a part of this? I have never seen this kind of treatment at any other bank I’ve worked.”

The soul searching and Christ’s Spirit finally brought things together for me. It happened while returning from my lunch break one day as I walked through the bank lobby to my work station. What I experienced was Christ walking with me and one by one he pointed out each of my co-workers who had fallen asleep spiritually and who he could no longer reach. It wasn’t that they were evil persons or any less worthy than me or had some kind of hell awaiting their souls. It was simply that God and God’s purposes were missing from their lives. “This will happen to you,” Christ said, “if you choose to remain in this field. You will never come to know yourself in the ways I need you to for the calling and work I have for you.”

The next day I walked into the bank president’s office and tendered my resignation. Less than a week later, I was wiping up urine in a care center for neurologically disabled children. A month after that I was working as an aide on a psychiatric inpatient unit. Twenty years later with a master’s degree in psychology and licensure as a mental health professional in Washington State, I would care-manage all publicly funded adult mental health services in a county of 340,000 people. Now, I serve as a bishop in my church traveling a twelve state area counseling people regarding estate planning and their personal legacies and how they can support the work of God’s Peaceable Kingdom long after they have left this mortal existence.

Looking back on it all, I would have to say that one of my most important dark moments involving “Jesus standing on the shore” was that day in the bank lobby some 32 years ago. And while I’m no Peter and no vast or small church depends the slightest upon me or my legacy or what happens in my life --- what has been most important is what Christ did to set me on a path to knowing and understanding myself (and others) in ways that would not otherwise have been possible. Hopefully because of that, I have been a bit like Peter and have fed and nurtured a few of God’s sheep. May the same be said of you and your journey is my hope and prayer this day.

******************* 
Resources utilized:
  • Commentary from Jim Rice, Sojourner’s Magazine editor, available at  Sojourners Sermon Preparation website.  Subscription required
  • New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) of the Bible, John 21:1-19
  • Community of Christ Worship Helps for April 18th, 2010 


Wednesday, April 7, 2010

"Disobedience"


For Sunday, April 11th, 2010

(Photo of Sojourners' Jim Wallis being arrested for civil disobedience in December 2005 while protesting federal budget cuts under consideration by the House of Representatives.  Blog author also arrested.  Total of 115 faith leaders detained.)

Lectionary Reading - Acts 5:27-32 NRSV

When they had brought them, they had them stand before the council. The high priest questioned them, saying, "We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name, yet here you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and you are determined to bring this man's blood on us." But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than any human authority. The God of our ancestors raised up Jesus, whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior that he might give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey him."

Disobedience

Commentary from Chris Haslam of the Anglican Diocese of Montreal provides helpful context for the above scripture. It tells us that Peter and John have been arrested by the religious authorities for teaching that God raised Jesus from the dead and because of such an event, all persons have hope of eternal life. The “council” mentioned in the above scripture is the Sanhedrin. It functioned as the Supreme Court of Israel. It was therefore the ultimate law enforcement authority before which the apostles could be brought with the exception of the Romans of course. The Sanhedrin was comprised of seventy-one rabbinic elders and it judged cases and made rulings at the Temple almost daily except for Sabbath and religious festival holidays. It is therefore the legal body that ordered the apostles not to speak or preach in Jesus name. Given that it had become corrupt and was complicit in Jesus’ execution and feared the apostles’ popularity among the people, the Sanhedrin decides initially to let the apostles off with a warning and does not punish them.

The warning however is insufficient for the apostles’ teachings and works in Jesus’ name lead to an alarming growth in the number of those who call themselves Christians. The Sanhedrin decides therefore to take further action to suppress the apostles. It does so out of fear that it will lose its authority and control over the people because the apostles are able to do something the Sanhedrin can’t. And what they’re able to do is heal the sick in quite miraculous ways. So this time, the Sanhedrin imprisons the apostles. Yet a divine messenger sets them free and so the apostles go right back to preaching in the outer court of the Temple. Subsequently, the Temple police round up the apostles again and take them directly before the Sanhedrin.

This time the Sanhedrin’s high priest accuses the apostles of trying to place blame for Jesus’ death upon the council itself. Led by Apostle Peter, the apostles insist that they must obey God’s will rather than the Sanhedrin’s orders. And then, without fear, they publicly lay responsibility for Jesus’ death at the feet of the Sanhedrin. The council members become enraged. They want Peter dead. But a famous liberal rabbi of the Sanhedrin named Gamaliel cautions the council. He tells them that if everything about Jesus is of human origin, then the Jesus movement will fail and will do so in its own good time. If however the Christian movement is of God, the Sanhedrin will not be able to overthrow it and the council will have therefore been working against God.

Ultimately, the council decides not to kill the apostles. Instead, the Apostles Peter and John are flogged for their earlier offenses. This torture does not stop the apostles and despite the Sanhedrin’s orders to quit teaching and healing in Jesus name, the apostles return to doing what Jesus commanded them and they do so in the courts of the Temple and in people’s homes.

In light of the above, my faith tradition asks three critically important questions this week. The questions are in regard to disobedience toward those who claim authority of one kind or another over us. The questions are these: 1) How would you respond if you were in the sandals of the first disciples in their situation before Sanhedrin? 2) What situations do you face now that require you to obey God rather than an unjust human authority? 3) What is the role of other members of your faith community when someone in that community takes the risk to obey God rather than an unjust human authority?”

In terms of answering the first two questions, I think my November 19th 2009 post titled “For This I Came” says things pretty plainly for me. The post reflects on my arrest in December 2005 for an act of civil disobedience toward the U.S. government --- so rather than repeat things here readers can follow the preceding link if interested in more details.

What I want to focus upon instead in this post is the role that members in our faith communities should take when someone in that community risks obeying God rather than some unjust human authority. In terms of my situation in December 2005, I was pastor of an urban congregation in Portland, Oregon. As a member congregation in a denominational hierarchy, my superiors felt that I needed to speak with the congregation regarding my intentions to participate in civil disobedience. They counseled that it would be important to determine whether the congregation could continue to accept my leadership if I carried through with the civil disobedience.

After conferring with my lay pastorate of six congregational members, we decided that I should speak first with all the lay ministers in the congregation and then address the congregation during my sermon later that same morning. At the meeting with our lay ministers, I spoke regarding our call as a denomination dedicated in Christ’s name to pursue peace and justice for all people. I spoke as well to my sense of the Spirit calling me to participate in civil protest and disobedience toward a government that for me had lost its way and needed people to stand against its intentions to cut funding to our most vulnerable and needful citizens while also handing the wealthy very generous tax breaks.

The responses from my lay ministers were overwhelmingly supportive. A few felt however that “church” and what they regarded as “politics” shouldn’t mix and should be very separate from each other. One person did become angry over my intentions to address the congregation however he and I spoke further after the meeting. Concerned for the man’s feelings, I asked it would be easier on him if I stepped out of the pulpit and addressed the congregation from the main floor. He responded that the symbolism would provide him some comfort and comfort others as well.

The worship service went well and at the point during the service that I intended to speak to the congregation regarding my trip to the nation’s capitol to participate in civil disobedience, I did as promised and stepped from the pulpit to the main floor. I spoke openly and passionately about the calling I felt to participate in the civil disobedience. I also acknowledged the feelings and discomfort of those who did not agree with me. I subsequently shared that I thought most of the congregation probably supported me and what I needed most that morning was to hear from those who might be upset with me. I offered that following the service I would be in the church library to meet with those individuals and then asked that those who were supportive simply go on about their plans for the rest of the day and that I would could them at another point during the week.

An amazing thing happened following the service, only one person came to see me in the library. It was the individual who had been upset with me earlier. He simply came to say that while he did not agree with what I planned to do or why I wanted to do it, he said, “I want you to know that I respect it.” A little while later an elderly member came to see me. With tears in his eyes and obvious support for what I intended to do, he said, “I want you to know that you are my pastor and you are my friend.”

As time progressed toward my trip to Washington D.C., I heard from other individuals. Some pressed money into my hand to help defray costs for the trip as I was taking personal leave and paying for expenses out of my own pocket. On my return from the trip, I shared through another Sunday morning message what had happened during the protest and civil disobedience and how the experience affected me personally and spiritually. Some bristled at my witness as it again tested their boundaries regarding “church” and “politics”. But mostly the response from my congregation was overwhelmingly supportive and affirming as my disobedience brought to life in very real and contemporary ways why we do what we do for the cause of God’s Peaceable Kingdom.

So rather than trying to answer question three above in some formulaic way, I’ll leave you this week with simply my story and hope it speaks well enough for itself when someone you love risks disobedience in order to obey the One it truly matters to follow.

May Christ’s Peace be with you!

(more photos and testimony of the Sojourners December 2005 event can be viewed at http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=action.display&item=051214_arrests_testimony)